Metric Spaces
Comprehensive module covering 5 sections in Functional Analysis.
REPOSITORY
BMLABS MATHEMATICS REPOSITORY
mathematics.bmlabs.co.in
Author
Dr. Bivash Majumder
Assistant Professor in Mathematics
Prabhat Kumar College, Contai
Abstract Algebra · Subgroups and Normal Subgroups
Learn Relatively Prime Subgroup Orders in Subgroups and Normal Subgroups.
Understand the central mathematical ideas of Relatively Prime Subgroup Orders.
Use the key definitions and notation accurately.
Interpret the principal results and their mathematical conditions.
Follow and justify the main proof strategy step by step.
Learning studio
1 concepts
6 guided steps
3 worked items
Learning path
Learning command centre
Progress is stored only in this browser. Academic content remains complete and printable.
1
Definitions
1
Theorems
0
Lemmas
2
Corollaries
3
Proofs
2
Examples
1
Exercises
2
Visual tools
Local progress
Lesson profile
definition
theorem
corollary
corollary
introductory
Concepts: Exercises
Go to exerciseInteractive concept atlas
20 concepts · 26 relationships · auto mode
Concept map ready to load
The graph engine loads only when this learning map approaches the viewport.
Relatively Prime Subgroup Orders Concept Map. 20 concepts.
1
Definitions
6
Results
3
Applications
2
Practice
2 practice items
The product formula becomes especially simple when two subgroups have relatively prime orders. If and have no common divisor other than , then the intersection must have only one element. Since every subgroup contains the identity element, this means . This lecture shows how Lagrange's theorem controls intersections through divisibility and then uses that control to count products of subgroups.
Let be a group and let be finite subgroups of . The subgroups and are said to have if
Let be a group and let be finite subgroups of . If
then
Given that is a group, are finite subgroups of , and .
To prove that
Since is a subgroup of , Lagrange's theorem gives
Since is a subgroup of , Lagrange's theorem gives
Therefore is a common divisor of and .
Since , we get
Since , the subgroup has exactly one element. Therefore
Hence,
We observe why relatively prime subgroup orders force a trivial intersection. Choose the orders of and , and compare their positive divisors side by side. The order of must appear in both divisor lists, because the intersection is a subgroup of both and . When the only common divisor is , the identity is the only possible element of the intersection.
Visual laboratory
Dynamic Sandbox
The proof is a divisibility argument. Once the only common divisor is , Lagrange's theorem leaves no room for a larger intersection subgroup.
Let be a group and let be finite subgroups of . If , then
Given that is a group, are finite subgroups of , and .
To prove that
By the previous theorem,
Therefore
By the product formula for finite subgroups,
Hence,
Let be a finite group and let be subgroups of . If , then
Given that is a finite group, are subgroups of , and .
To prove that
By the previous corollary,
Since , we get
Therefore
Hence,
Let under addition modulo . Let
and
Then
and
Since , we get
Also,
Let be a group and let be finite subgroups of . Suppose and . Prove that .
Let be a group and let be finite subgroups of .
Since
we get
By the theorem on relatively prime subgroup orders,
We compute the greatest common divisor of and and use it to decide what the theorem guarantees. When the gcd is , the calculator reports the trivial intersection and computes . If an ambient group order is entered, the same calculation checks whether the inequality is possible. Notice that when the gcd is not , the theorem simply does not apply; it does not prove that the intersection is nontrivial.
Interactive calculator
Let be finite subgroups of a group with and . Find .
Let be finite subgroups of a group with and . Find .
Let be a finite group with subgroups such that and . What inequality involving follows?
Therefore
Questions to consolidate
Continue learning
Continue with subgroup orders inside groups whose order is a power of a prime.