Metric Spaces
Comprehensive module covering 5 sections in Functional Analysis.
REPOSITORY
BMLABS MATHEMATICS REPOSITORY
mathematics.bmlabs.co.in
Author
Dr. Bivash Majumder
Assistant Professor in Mathematics
Prabhat Kumar College, Contai
Abstract Algebra · Subgroups and Normal Subgroups
Learn Cosets as Equivalence Classes in Subgroups and Normal Subgroups.
Understand the central mathematical ideas of Cosets as Equivalence Classes.
Use the key definitions and notation accurately.
Interpret the principal results and their mathematical conditions.
Follow and justify the main proof strategy step by step.
Learning studio
2 concepts
4 guided steps
3 worked items
Learning path
Learning command centre
Progress is stored only in this browser. Academic content remains complete and printable.
2
Definitions
2
Theorems
0
Lemmas
0
Corollaries
2
Proofs
2
Examples
1
Exercises
2
Visual tools
Local progress
Lesson profile
definition
theorem
definition
theorem
introductory
Concepts: Exercises
Go to exerciseInteractive concept atlas
20 concepts · 24 relationships · auto mode
Concept map ready to load
The graph engine loads only when this learning map approaches the viewport.
Cosets as Equivalence Classes Concept Map. 20 concepts.
2
Definitions
4
Results
3
Applications
2
Practice
2 practice items
Cosets can also be understood through equivalence relations. This viewpoint explains why cosets form partitions: every equivalence relation partitions a set into equivalence classes. For a subgroup of a group , the relation defined by produces left cosets. A related relation defined by produces right cosets. This lecture connects the algebraic definition of a coset with the general set-theoretic idea of equivalence classes.
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . The on determined by is the relation defined by
for all .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . Let be the relation on defined by
Then is an equivalence relation and
for every .
Given that is a group, is a subgroup of , and is defined on by
To prove that is an equivalence relation and for every .
[1] To prove reflexivity.
Let . Then
Therefore .
[2] To prove symmetry.
Let and let . Then
Since is a subgroup, it is closed under inverses. Therefore
Therefore .
[3] To prove transitivity.
Let such that and . Then
and
Since is closed under , we get
Therefore .
Therefore is an equivalence relation.
Now let . Then
Hence, is an equivalence relation and for every .
We observe the equivalence class of an element under the left coset relation in . Choose an element and the preview finds all such that lies in . The resulting class is exactly the coset . This connects the algebraic translation picture with the set-theoretic idea of equivalence classes.
Visual laboratory
Dynamic Sandbox
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . The on determined by is the relation defined by
for all .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . Let be the relation on defined by
Then is an equivalence relation and
for every .
Given that is a group, is a subgroup of , and is defined on by
To prove that is an equivalence relation and for every .
[1] To prove reflexivity.
Let . Then
Therefore .
[2] To prove symmetry.
Let and let . Then
Since is a subgroup, it is closed under inverses. Therefore
Therefore .
[3] To prove transitivity.
Let such that and . Then
and
Since is closed under , we get
Therefore .
Therefore is an equivalence relation.
Now let . Then
Hence, is an equivalence relation and for every .
Let under addition modulo and let
For the left coset relation, in additive notation,
The class of is
Thus the equivalence class of is exactly the coset determined by .
Let under addition modulo and let . For the relation if and only if , find .
Let and .
The relation is the left coset relation in additive notation. Therefore
We compute the equivalence class of an element for the modular left coset relation. The calculator checks each residue and keeps exactly those satisfying . It then compares the class with the coset . This makes the identity between equivalence classes and cosets visible element by element.
Interactive calculator
Let and let . For the relation if and only if , find .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . Prove that if and only if .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . Prove that if and only if .
By definition, if and only if . By the left coset membership criterion, this is equivalent to .
By definition, if and only if . By the right coset membership criterion, this is equivalent to .
Questions to consolidate
Continue learning
Continue with the size of cosets and the correspondence between left and right cosets.