Metric Spaces
Comprehensive module covering 5 sections in Functional Analysis.
REPOSITORY
BMLABS MATHEMATICS REPOSITORY
mathematics.bmlabs.co.in
Author
Dr. Bivash Majumder
Assistant Professor in Mathematics
Prabhat Kumar College, Contai
Abstract Algebra · Subgroups and Normal Subgroups
Learn Cosets Determined by Elements of a Subgroup in Subgroups and Normal Subgroups.
Understand the central mathematical ideas of Cosets Determined by Elements of a Subgroup.
Interpret the principal results and their mathematical conditions.
Follow and justify the main proof strategy step by step.
Apply the method to representative examples and problems.
Learning studio
5 concepts
6 guided steps
3 worked items
Learning path
Learning command centre
Progress is stored only in this browser. Academic content remains complete and printable.
0
Definitions
2
Theorems
0
Lemmas
1
Corollaries
3
Proofs
2
Examples
1
Exercises
2
Visual tools
Local progress
Lesson profile
theorem
theorem
corollary
introductory
Concepts: Exercises
Go to exerciseInteractive concept atlas
19 concepts · 25 relationships · auto mode
Concept map ready to load
The graph engine loads only when this learning map approaches the viewport.
Cosets Determined by Elements of a Subgroup Concept Map. 19 concepts.
0
Definitions
6
Results
3
Applications
2
Practice
2 practice items
The previous lecture introduced left and right cosets. We now study the first important special case: what happens when the representative itself belongs to the subgroup. This case is foundational because it tells us exactly when a coset is not new at all. If the representative lies inside , then multiplying by that representative simply reproduces . Conversely, if a coset determined by equals , then must lie in . This result is often the first place where students see that cosets behave like shifted copies of a subgroup.
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . If , then
Given that is a group, is a subgroup of , and .
To prove that .
[1] Let .
To prove that .
Let . Then there exists such that
Since and is closed under , we get .
Therefore
Let . Since and is a subgroup of , we get . Therefore .
Now
Therefore .
Therefore
Therefore
[2] Let .
To prove that .
Since , we get
Since , we get .
Hence,
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . If , then
Given that is a group, is a subgroup of , and .
To prove that .
[1] Let .
To prove that .
Let . Then there exists such that
Since and is closed under , we get .
Therefore
Let . Since and is a subgroup of , we get . Therefore .
Now
Therefore .
Therefore
Therefore
[2] Let .
To prove that .
Since , we get
Since , we get .
Hence,
We observe the special case where the representative already belongs to the subgroup. Choose a subgroup of and a representative, then compare with . When lies in , the translation only rearranges the same elements, so the coset is not new. When does not lie in , the coset is a shifted copy that differs from .
Visual laboratory
Dynamic Sandbox
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . If , then
and
Given that is a group, is a subgroup of , and .
To prove that and .
Since , we get .
If possible, let . By the previous theorem on left cosets,
A contradiction. Therefore .
If possible, let . By the previous theorem on right cosets,
A contradiction.
Hence, and .
Let under addition modulo and let
Since , the coset determined by is
This example illustrates the theorem in additive notation.
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . Suppose . Prove that .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of .
Given that .
Since , by the left coset criterion we get
Since is a subgroup of , it is closed under taking inverses. Therefore
We test the theorem numerically in . Enter a subgroup step and a representative, and the calculator checks both statements: whether the representative belongs to the subgroup and whether the coset equals the subgroup. Notice that the two answers always agree in this additive setting. This is the finite modular version of if and only if .
Interactive calculator
Let under addition modulo and let . Find .
Let be a group and let be a subgroup of . If , prove that .
Let be a subgroup of . Prove that if , then cannot be equal to .
Since , the right coset criterion gives . Since is a subgroup, .
If , then the left coset criterion gives , which contradicts . Therefore .
Questions to consolidate
Continue learning
Continue with the theorem that two cosets are either equal or disjoint.