Real AnalysisFUNCTIONSHyperbolic and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
Applications of Inverse Hyperbolic Differentiation
:::section[Strategy for Applications]
For each expression, first determine the real domain of the outer inverse function. Then identify the required product, quotient, or chain rules. Only after the domain has been fixed should the derivative be simplified.
This order prevents a formal derivative from being mistaken for the derivative of a real-valued function.
:::
:::solved-problem[Inverse Sine after Tangent]
Let
f(x)=sinh−1(tanx).
The tangent is defined when x=2π+kπ, where k∈Z. Since sinh−1 accepts every real input,
f′(x)=1+tan2xsec2x=sec2xsec2x=∣secx∣sec2x=∣secx∣.
The absolute value is necessary because the principal square root is nonnegative.
:::
:::solved-problem[Inverse Cosine after Inverse Sine]
Let
y=cosh−1(sinh−1x).
The outer inverse cosine requires sinh−1x≥1, so x≥sinh1. Differentiability requires the strict inequality x>sinh1. Therefore,
dxdy=(sinh−1x)2−11+x21,x>sinh1.
:::
:::solved-problem[An Arctangent-Hyperbolic Composition]
Let
y=tan−1(tanh2x).
Using the chain rule,
dxdy=1+tanh2(x/2)21sech2(x/2)=2coshx1.
The final step follows from
1+tanh2usech2u=cosh2u1.
:::
:::theorem[Useful Real Identities]
With the stated domain restrictions,
coth−1(x2)sinh−1(1−x2x)sinh−1x=sinh−1(4−x2x),=tanh−1x,=cosh−11+x2,0<∣x∣<2,∣x∣<1,x≥0.
For arbitrary real x, the last equality must be written
∣sinh−1x∣=cosh−11+x2.
:::
:::proof[Proof of the Third Identity]
Let u=sinh−1x. Then sinhu=x and
coshu=1+sinh2u=1+x2.
If x≥0, then u≥0, which lies in the principal range of cosh−1. Hence
u=cosh−11+x2.
Therefore the stated identity holds for x≥0. For general real x, the principal inverse cosine returns ∣u∣, which gives the absolute-value version. □
:::
:::solved-problem[Solving a Linear Hyperbolic Equation]
Given that
5sinhx−coshx=5,
write s=sinhx and c=coshx. Then c=5s−5. Substituting into c2−s2=1 gives
(5s−5)2−s224s2−50s+24(3s−4)(4s−3)=1,=0,=0.
The value s=3/4 would give c=−5/4, which is impossible because coshx>0. Hence
sinhx=34,coshx=35,tanhx=54.
:::
:::mistake[Formal Differentiation Does Not Create a Real Function]
The expression tanh−1(cothx) is not real for any x=0, because ∣cothx∣>1 while the real domain of tanh−1 is (−1,1). A formally simplified derivative therefore does not describe a real-valued composition.
:::
:::exercise[Practice Questions]
1. Differentiate y=csch−1(5x) for x>0.
2. Differentiate y=tanh−1(x2+1x2−1) for x>0.
3. Prove that coth−1(cothx)=x for x=0, and differentiate both sides.
4. Given that coshx=secθ and sinhx=tanθ, prove that secθ+tanθ=ex.
:::
:::answer[Answers and Guidance]
1.
y′=−2x1+25x1.
2. Let u=(x2−1)/(x2+1). Then u′=4x/(x2+1)2 and 1−u2=4x2/(x2+1)2, so
y′=x1.
3. The principal inverse cotangent has range R∖{0}, which contains each admissible x. Hence the composition law holds on both intervals (−∞,0) and (0,∞); differentiating gives 1=1.
4. Substitute the two given relations into coshx+sinhx=ex.
:::
:::faq[Frequently Asked Questions]
Q: Why does ∣secx∣ appear in the first derivative?
A: Because sec2x=∣secx∣, not secx on intervals where secant is negative.
Q: Can an inverse-hyperbolic identity be stated without a domain?
A: No. Radicals, logarithms, and principal inverse branches can restrict an identity to a proper subset of the real line.
Q: Why is the root giving coshx<0 rejected?
A: The exponential definition gives coshx=(ex+e−x)/2>0 for every real x.
:::
:::call-to-action[Continue Learning]
subtitle: Turn the differentiation table into a basic library of hyperbolic antiderivatives and verify each formula by differentiation.
button: Learn Hyperbolic Integration Formulas|/real-analysis/functions/hyperbolic-and-inverse-hyperbolic-functions/integration-formulas-for-hyperbolic-functions
button-ghost: Review This Section|/real-analysis/functions/hyperbolic-and-inverse-hyperbolic-functions
:::
Formal Differentiation Does Not Create a Real Function
The expression tanh−1(cothx) is not real for any x=0, because ∣cothx∣>1 while the real domain of tanh−1 is (−1,1). A formally simplified derivative therefore does not describe a real-valued composition.
For each expression, first determine the real domain of the outer inverse function. Then identify the required product, quotient, or chain rules. Only after the domain has been fixed should the derivative be simplified.
This order prevents a formal derivative from being mistaken for the derivative of a real-valued function.
Worked problem02
Inverse Sine after Tangent
Let
f(x)=sinh−1(tanx).
The tangent is defined when x=2π+kπ, where k∈Z. Since sinh−1 accepts every real input,
For arbitrary real x, the last equality must be written
∣sinh−1x∣=cosh−11+x2.
Reasoning pathway06
Proof of the Third Identity
Let u=sinh−1x. Then sinhu=x and
coshu=1+sinh2u=1+x2.
If x≥0, then u≥0, which lies in the principal range of cosh−1. Hence
u=cosh−11+x2.
Therefore the stated identity holds for x≥0. For general real x, the principal inverse cosine returns ∣u∣, which gives the absolute-value version. □
Worked problem07
Solving a Linear Hyperbolic Equation
Given that
5sinhx−coshx=5,
write s=sinhx and c=coshx. Then c=5s−5. Substituting into c2−s2=1 gives
(5s−5)2−s224s2−50s+24(3s−4)(4s−3)=1,=0,=0.
The value s=3/4 would give c=−5/4, which is impossible because coshx>0. Hence
sinhx=34,coshx=35,tanhx=54.
Common mistake
08
Formal Differentiation Does Not Create a Real Function
The expression tanh−1(cothx) is not real for any x=0, because ∣cothx∣>1 while the real domain of tanh−1 is (−1,1). A formally simplified derivative therefore does not describe a real-valued composition.
Independent practice09
Practice Questions
Differentiate y=csch−1(5x) for x>0.
Differentiate y=tanh−1(x2+1x2−1) for x>0.
Prove that coth−1(cothx)=x for x=0, and differentiate both sides.
Given that coshx=secθ and sinhx=tanθ, prove that secθ+tanθ=ex.
Answer10
Answers and Guidance
y′=−2x1+25x1.
Let u=(x2−1)/(x2+1). Then u′=4x/(x2+1)2 and 1−u2=4x2/(x2+1)2, so
y′=x1.
The principal inverse cotangent has range R∖{0}, which contains each admissible x. Hence the composition law holds on both intervals (−∞,0) and (0,∞); differentiating gives 1=1.
Substitute the two given relations into coshx+sinhx=ex.
Questions to consolidate
Frequently Asked Questions
3
1Why does ∣secx∣ appear in the first derivative?
Because sec2x=∣secx∣, not secx on intervals where secant is negative.
2Can an inverse-hyperbolic identity be stated without a domain?
No. Radicals, logarithms, and principal inverse branches can restrict an identity to a proper subset of the real line.
3Why is the root giving coshx<0 rejected?
The exponential definition gives coshx=(ex+e−x)/2>0 for every real x.
Continue learning
Continue Learning
Turn the differentiation table into a basic library of hyperbolic antiderivatives and verify each formula by differentiation.