Metric Spaces
Comprehensive module covering 5 sections in Functional Analysis.
REPOSITORY
BMLABS MATHEMATICS REPOSITORY
mathematics.bmlabs.co.in
Author
Dr. Bivash Majumder
Assistant Professor in Mathematics
Prabhat Kumar College, Contai
Abstract Algebra · Subgroups and Normal Subgroups
Learn Normality Inside Related Subgroups in Subgroups and Normal Subgroups.
Understand the central mathematical ideas of Normality Inside Related Subgroups.
Use the key definitions and notation accurately.
Interpret the principal results and their mathematical conditions.
Follow and justify the main proof strategy step by step.
Learning studio
1 concepts
6 guided steps
5 worked items
Learning path
Learning command centre
Progress is stored only in this browser. Academic content remains complete and printable.
1
Definitions
3
Theorems
0
Lemmas
0
Corollaries
3
Proofs
3
Examples
1
Exercises
2
Visual tools
Local progress
Lesson profile
definition
theorem
theorem
Let be a group and let be subgroups of . If is normal in , then is normal in .
theorem
Let be a group and let be subgroups of . If is normal in , then is normal in .
introductory
Interactive concept atlas
20 concepts · 25 relationships · auto mode
Concept map ready to load
The graph engine loads only when this learning map approaches the viewport.
Normality Inside Related Subgroups Concept Map. 20 concepts.
1
Definitions
6
Results
5
Applications
2
Practice
2 practice items
Normality is always relative to an ambient group. A subgroup may be normal in one group but not in a larger group, and this is why the notation must mention both and . In this lesson we examine what happens when the surrounding group is replaced by an intermediate subgroup, by a product subgroup, or by a subgroup that intersects a normal subgroup. These results are often used silently later in quotient group arguments, so it is useful to prove them explicitly now.
Let be a group and let be subgroups of . The subgroup is called an intermediate subgroup between and if
Let be a group and let be subgroups of such that
If is normal in , then is normal in .
Given that is a group, are subgroups of , , and is normal in . To prove that is normal in . Since is normal in ,
Since , this gives
Hence, is normal in .
The converse is not generally true. A subgroup can be normal in a smaller subgroup without being normal in the whole group. For example, every subgroup is normal in itself, but not every subgroup is normal in the larger group containing it.
Let be a group and let be subgroups of . If is normal in , then is normal in .
Given that is a group, are subgroups of , and is normal in . To prove that is normal in . Since is normal in , the product is a subgroup of . Also
Since , we get
Hence, is normal in .
Let be a group and let be subgroups of . If is normal in , then is normal in .
Given that is a group, are subgroups of , and is normal in . To prove that is normal in . Since is a subgroup of , it is enough to prove
Let and let . Then and . Since , we get
Since is normal in and , we get
Therefore
Thus
Hence, is normal in .
Let , let , and let . Since , the theorem gives
Here
which is normal in . This example is simple, but it captures the general principle: intersecting a subgroup with a normal subgroup produces a normal subgroup inside the smaller subgroup.
Let be subgroups. Suppose . Prove that using cosets.
Let . Since , we have . Since ,
Therefore
Thus is normal in .
Let and let . Prove that is a subgroup and that .
Since , we get
Therefore is a subgroup of . Now let . Since and ,
Hence
We observe that normality can be inherited when the ambient group gets smaller, but not usually when it gets larger. Select which facts are known, and the diagram shows the guaranteed conclusions. If and , then follows immediately. If only is known, no conclusion about is forced.
Visual laboratory
Dynamic Sandbox
We can combine the related-subgroup theorems with ordinary counting. Enter the orders of , , and to compute the size of . The normality checkbox records whether is known, which is the hypothesis that makes and automatic. The calculation and the normality conclusion are related but not the same kind of statement.
Questions to consolidate
Continue learning
Study the largest subgroup in which a given subgroup is normal.